Last in first out - Can this still be used in redundancy selection? | Winston Solicitors Skip to main content
employees and employers in the work force
Advice

Last in first out - Can this still be used in redundancy selection?

Samira Cakali Samira Cakali
3 min read

When selecting employees for redundancy, employers must follow a certain procedure and must apply any selection criteria fairly. These are general, well established principles of employment law.

There is no correct set of selection criteria although common examples of acceptable criteria include the following:

  • Attendance record
  • Disciplinary record
  • Standard of work and performance record
  • Skills, knowledge, qualifications and experience

These examples can more easily be quantified and employers should avoid criteria which tend to suggest a degree of subjective assessment.  These might include criteria such as “flexibility” or “team player” or, as in one case, “contribution to the company”.

Last in first out or LIFO was traditionally used and is now regarded as old fashioned and to be avoided.  It is discredited largely for reasons relating to discrimination.  From the employer’s point of view it means that a relatively recent employee who is a stellar performer of great value to the future of the business may have to be sacrificed for a time server nearing retirement with no enthusiasm for his or her employment (which is not to suggest that is the case for all older employees or that all younger employees are stellar performers).  From employees’ point of view, last in first out tends to be indirect sex discrimination against women, because women tend to have shorter employments than men in particular by reason of breaks for child care.  It can also be age discrimination, because younger employees are less likely to have had the opportunity to acquire long service records.

In the case of Allan v Oakley Builders and Groundwork contractors Limited the tribunal held that a last in first out approach was not an irrational method of redundancy selection.  In that case, all employees at risk of redundancy were female and the person selected, Mrs Allan, was in fact the oldest person in the selection pool.  The tribunal also remarked that Mrs Allan was comparing herself with the daughter of the director of the company.  It therefore may be said that it was nepotism to favour her over Mrs Allan but that had nothing to do with age and everything to do with a father/daughter relationship which is not unlawful discrimination.

In summary, last in first out is not entirely destined for the history books and it could for example be used as a tie-breaker in a situation where the other selection criteria produce a similar score.

Selecting for redundancy is never easy and at the end of the day, somebody has to come bottom.  However by adopting certain established principles, employers should be able to avoid costly and time consuming employment tribunals.

To discuss redundancy or other employment issues please contact Paul Grindley by calling 0113 320 5000 or emailing @email.

Client feedback

Our company M-Integrated Solutions PLC  (and other subsidiaries) has worked with Paul Grindley for many years. Paul is a very professional gentleman who is always available, and provides solid 360 degree advice on Employment Law. Paul’s professional guidance and advice over the last 14 months during COVID has been absolutely invaluable. We would be delighted to recommend Paul to any company looking for solid advice in and around Employment Law.
Jim Curley, London
 Paul Grindley has provided us with advice on employment law for the past 15 years. His professional approach and vast experience always makes us feel we are in very safe hands regardless of the query.  Paul goes the extra mile in understanding the business needs  and therefore has always provided us with reassurance of a problem quickly.   During COVID Winston Solicitors has also provided us with regular employment law updates which we have found to be extremely useful.    
Cyan Studios Ltd, Leeds
Paul was extremely helpful and efficient. He was professional in every way and got the job done. Many thanks. I would highly recommend
Catherine
Very knowledgable. Gave great advice. Responded to emails swiftly and was generous with time on the phone.
Wayne
I am very satisfied with the service that I have received. Hugh and Paul have always been prompt in their responses and diligent in their work. I have very much appreciated their support during the past few months.
Paul Connor, Leeds
Prompt professional service
Jolene
I've used Winston solicitors a couple of times now and have found them very efficient and knowledgeable. In each case, everything was explained in layman's terms and unlike some other firms, the meter didn't start running as soon as you picked up the phone. Highly recommend.
Jonathan
Paul Grindley has provided us with advice on employment law for the past 15 years.  His professional approach and vast experience always makes us feel we are in very safe hands regardless of the query.  Paul goes the extra mile in understanding the business needs and employees, and therefore has always provided us with reassurance of a problem quickly.   During COVID Winston Solicitors has also provided us with regular employment law updates which we have found to be extremely useful.  
Adele Flesher Cyan Studios Limited, Leeds